On designate. Sarah E. Richards discusses a new NIH-sponsored study by Dartmouth IVF researchers that shows by skipping hormone injections and going straight to IVF couples got pregnant three months faster with fewer treatment cycles and with a lower average cost [$61,000 vs $71,000]. Which makes the alter inspect that insurance companies should pay for more IVF sooner. Wait huh?
Let's break it down: If you drop the $3,000 hormone injection treatment you spend $3,000 less. [It takes a randomized study to evaluate this out?] If you start IVF even slightly earlier it can improve your chances per $10,000 cycle so you may save a cycle. So any one couple's likely savings are either $3k or $13k.
The study looked at 500 patients; assume that the 337 fewer treatment cycles applied only to the half who got the fast bring in. If by definition. 250 of those cycles were the hormone injections that'd mean 87 fewer IVF cycles or a 1-in-3 chance of needing one less make pass to get pregnant. But that be produces an average savings of only $4600. So maybe they
need a chew over to show that not spending $3,000 saves $3,000. So if the 337 treatment cycles are all IVF then the study results convey skipping the injections means an average of 1.3 fewer IVF cycles/patient to get the same pregnancy evaluate which is probably 0 fewer for some. 1 fewer for a lot of populate and 2 fewer for a few.
Which is all great in the abstract but in reality economic and psychological factors come into compete whether insurance covers fertility treatments or you have to pay out of take. There seems to be a definite low-impact appeal to the first round pills [$500. 9% success] and second round shots [$3000. 15% success] before jumping straight to the highest-price most elaborate treatment. [Also are none of these treatments related to male fertility? Does the insemination step and/or IVF process just destroy male uncertainty from the equation?]
And don't insurance companies look first at the overall cost savings including the 24% of folks who never need IVF because they get pregnant in round one or round two? Is it possible to carry on any more inconclusively about a single incomplete report of a yet-to-be-published study? At least Richards got paid to create verbally hers.
I'm not sure I understand the double-negative construction of your question regarding male infertility but I'll furnish it a stab. Distilled down to the most rudimentary: currently fertility medications are primarily for women's fertility problems while fertility procedures attempt to compensate for male and female issues.
More specifically oral fertility medications (e g. Clomid) treat ovulation issues so that one is female only. There are a variety of injectable medications that interact different steps in the conception process again on the female side.
IUI and IVF along with other techniques like ICSI and assisted hatching are not gender-linked procedures - they can help overcome male or female infertility issues depending on what you are up against. For example if the male produces a low volume of sperm or a limited quantity of viable sperm both IUI and IVF can address these problems.
[thanks should've been clearer. I meant that when we hear about reports of male fertility issues and research they go away out by saying that male fertility problems account for--surprise--half of the cases. But this particular chew over only addresses female interfertility issues all the males partners in the study had normal sperm count and motility. I guess I haven't done the research on the entire undergo and process leading up to IVF which I'd evaluate involves isolating the fertility problems early on. -ed.]
Post relevant constructive and value-adding comments here. Comments may be edited for typos and formatting but that's about it. Extremely contradict comments may prompt an invitation to reconsider,but the only candidates for immediate deletion are irrelevant self-promoting links and PR spam. Read details. No matter what I do.
the server ordain tellmost of you there was an error in submitting your comment. Be skeptical. The server sucks.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://daddytypes.com/2007/11/21/ivf_researchers_skipping_straight_to_ivf_saves_time_uh_money.php
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|